Showing posts with label Dragons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dragons. Show all posts

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Thoughts from the TED talks

TED Talks

Handspring Puppet Company TED Talk

*Joey the horse from War Horse is a puppet created by them. He must be able to be ridden, to breath, to walk, canter and gallop, he must have emotional impact (the emotions of a horse are apparent through their ear movements (back for scared, forwards for playful, around for observation - the horses hearing is almost more important to them than their eyesight).
*Puppets are ‘dead' objects brought to life, "the actor struggles to die on stage, the puppet struggles to live”. 
The true life is breathed metaphorically into the puppet by the puppeteer(s)(link to Motion Capture)
 (in this case three for Joey, one at the hindquarters for tail (side to side and up and down) and legs, one at the ‘heart centre’ for the front two legs and breath up and down movement (anatomically incorrect, but this does not matter as 1. side to side movement is not as easy to see, and the audience can believe that this is breathe) plus a puppeteer who controls the head (ears, movement of the neck)
synchronisation of the three puppeteers is what truly brings the puppet to life, example, the whinnying and breath of the horse is not recorded, but starts with a puppeteer and spreads through to the others organically (without any verbal communication between the puppeteers).
This made me think of a recent film released called The Hobbit (Both ‘An Unexpected Journey and ‘The Desolation of Smaug’) and of the films The Lord of the Rings (1,2,3). In conversations I’ve had with my best friend who has a film degree, he commented that the reason he believed that the recent Hobbit films were not as good because the production team relied too heavily on CGI, when the could have used actual actors:



This then made me think about the amazing performance of Andy Serkis as Gollum, and the fact that, in my opinion, this performance was so good because he (Serkis) was on set in full Mo-Cap suit with Martin Freeman, much more like a theatre stage set rather than Freeman interacting with a green screen process. (Also, Serkis’ voice was captured at the same time). To me, this is like a 21st century version of puppetry.



Then, I begun thinking about Smaug, the main antagonist of the second Hobbit movie, who also happens to be a dragon. Although I have yet to see the dragon puppet we are using, I believe this behind the scene look at Benedict Cumberbatch doing the Mo-Cap and voice for the dragon will be super useful for us.




Julie Taymor - TED Talk - Spiderman, The Lion King and life on the creative edge

What is the Idiograph for Beowulf (The circle for The Lion King, a sandcastle for The Tempest) 

Theatre is a ‘rough magic’, the stage hands coming on stage to water the sandcastle are visible and obvious, the audience still ’see’ them, then the light changes and the audience see only the water and sandcastle, they ‘suspend their disbelief’.


The mechanics used in the show must be equal to the story (puppet, scenery etc must be as good/not better, than the story or visa versa)

Thursday, 23 January 2014

What is the Dragon?

Beowulf's Dragon




“Middle English (also denoting a large serpent): from Old French, via Latin from Greek drakōn 'serpent'. A mythical monster like a giant reptile. In European tradition the dragon is typically fire-breathing and tends to symbolize chaos or evil.” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2013)

The story:
After successfully slaying Grendels Mother, Beowulf rules Geatland as their King for 50 years.
However a slave steals a golden cup from the Dragons lair and awakens him the dragon then burns all the Geats homes and land. Beowulf (though now in his old age) decides to slay the dragon. He and the Thanes climb to the Dragons lair, but when the Thanes see the Dragon they abandon Beowulf and Wiglaf. They successfully slay the Dragon, only to find that Beowulf has been mortally wounded by a bite in his neck.


Beowulf is the first piece of English Literature to present a Dragonslayer (Evans, 2010) and a fire breathing Dragon, and was later the basis on which J. R. R. Tolkien based Smaug in The Hobbit, which was the forerunner of the modern High Fantasy genre (Tolkien, 1936). However, the original author would have had access to earlier Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian oral stories, although these stories have been lost.

Characteristics:
Fire breathing
Venomous
Draca (dragon) and wyrm (worm)
Nocturnal
Treasure hoarding
Vengeful

Semiotics of ‘The Dragon” (Beowulf specific)
Fire: Hell fire,
Middle English word Dragon: Chaos and evil
Nocturnal: Darkness is its protection; also means the fire looks cooler! :p
Gold: Hoarding, against the code of Hospitality
The battle of Beowulf and the dragon probably symbolizes the battle against evil (Alaxender, 2003)
It is actually Wiglaf who finishes the dragon off, not Beowulf. Its his courage that shows him the be the right successor of Beowulf.

Cool things I think are cool:
I found the entire book of Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics by Tolkien and you can read it online! http://www.scribd.com/doc/21301124/J-R-R-Tolkien-Beowulf-The-Monsters-and-the-Critics

Bibliography
Alaxender, M., 2003. Beowulf. Penguin Books Limited.
Evans, J., 2010. The Dragon'Lore of Middle Earth: Tolkien and Old English and Old Norse Tradition. Greenwood Press.
Oxford Dictionaries, 2013. dragon. [Online] Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/dragon?q=dragon [Accessed 22 January 2013].
Tolkien, J.R.R., 1936. Beowulf: The Monsters and The Critics. New ed. [Lecture] Harper Collins. Sir Israel Gollancz Lecture.

P.s. Most dragon make-up isn't that good, to be honest. But I found a few that I thought were cool.