Life, Consciousness and Existance in Endgame

The question of what it means to be alive is a reoccurring theme within many of Beckett's works. In endgame it is clear that Beckett is concerned with what it means to exist and he explores the aspects of life that other playwrights do not. Endgame is a good example of this, because it examines human existence in way that 'Humanist' playwrights do not. Instead of focusing on themes and characters that represent what is good about human existence, Endgame focuses on the nasty, often raw aspects of existence. It is in this dark humanism that we often find humour and empathy for the characters who appear stuck in an endless cycle, with no suggestion that the next day will bring any change. A good example of this in the text is at the end when Clov says he is leaving but then comes back. Hamm has his handkerchief back over his face in a picture reminiscent of how the piece began. This is reminiscent of Beckett's 'Waiting for Godot' where the characters are presented in a confused world where repetition and the cylindrical nature of life is played out on stage. It is interesting to note the comparison in structure here as well. In both Endgame and Waiting for Godot there are small deviations of the main characters to introduce small characters such of that of the 'youth' in Endgame and Messenger boy in Waiting for Godot. It is in these repetitions that you begin to realise that every day will be the same, and each day is  a complete cycle in itself. This is examining human existence in the sense that it represents a world that appears a horrible, gruelling task to endure.

Hamm and Clov are interesting characters to examine when looking at themes of existence and existentialism within Endgame. Clove states "All life long the same questions, the same answerer's" (1.29)
This is mirroring the action that takes place within the play, which does not change from day to day. Does this mean that Clov knows his life has no meaning and even revels in the idea of meaningless existence? Maybe taking some relief or comfort in the meaninglessness of it all?
Is it better or worse for life to have meaning?
In waiting for Godot, the characters are seemingly waiting for someone that never comes. The same interruptions and conversations come with each new day and again there is no suggestion that anything will change the next day. "Nothing happens. Nobody comes, nobody goes. Its awful" (waiting for Godot) This is similar to the language in Endgame and it reveals that the characters know their doomed fate. doomed to repeat the same humanistic mistakes day after day with no possible way of changing this course.